Page 12 of 16
Previous Page | Next Page
Entire Chapter One (Suitable for Printing)

On Friday, April 23, Brobeck called Kors to announce that the Monday hearing had been postponed, citing "too much publicity," but then correcting himself: "The real reason is that the women no longer have an advisor." The advisor had been Zoila Airall of the Division of Residential Living. "She doesn't want to appear in the case," Brobeck admitted, "and we can't have the hearing without their advisor." When reminded if his insistence that the hearing would be held on April 26 even if Eden had to be completely on his own (while the women's case would be presented by the JIO) and of the fact that Eden would lose his witnesses when the semester ended, Brobeck replied, "It's my judgment call. The case is postponed indefinitely...until, at earliest, in the fall." When Eden was informed, he asked, "Are they going to have this hang over my head all summer?" Indeed, they were.

No one had thought to notify the media about the postponement of the hearing. Consequently, on the morning of April 26, The Wall Street Journal ran Dorothy Rabinowitz's lead editorial "Buffaloed at Penn." It described Eden as "the latest victim of the ideological fever known as political correctness," and it referred the case to the attention of "anyone concerned with the state of reason and sanity on the campuses today." It labeled "Kafkaesque" the fact that someone who had not shouted any racial slurs, and who had told the police what he had said, "would pay a price for his forthrightness." It drew the deeper lesson: "He had yet to learn what they don't teach at freshman orientation; namely he had now entered a world where a charge of racism or sexism is as good as a conviction." Pointing out the obvious facts that zoo, animals, or even, indeed, Animal House were universal references to noise on college campuses, it described Robin Read's discovery of racism in Eden's innocuous phrase as "theater of the absurd." It also noted clearly the "settlement" that Eden had been offered, and the courage it had taken to turn that down.39 The effect of the Forward's article and The Wall Street Journal's editorial -- in the wake of Hackney's nomination and his equivocation on the theft of the DP -- was electric. Eden was interviewed on television by Tom Snyder and John McLaughlin. George Will devoted his syndicated column in The Washington Post to Eden and to the theft of the DPs.40 Within short order, the international media settled in at Penn.

Although, in the final analysis, the University of Pennsylvania took a beating in public opinion because it had, as its leading press officer said the next year, "a stupid case to defend,"41 Penn repeatedly revealed an arrogance that the media scarcely could believe. Hackney's slamming the phone on Dorothy Rabinowitz could have been a metaphor for Penn's entire handling of the case. Reporters were reconciled to hearing the University say that it did not want to discuss the specifics of the Jacobowitz case, but Penn refused to discuss even its speech code, its past practices, its history of enforcement, or its violations of procedure. Reporters, editorialists, cartoonists, and broadcast journalists understood freedom of speech. They understood double standards, due process, and decency. Reporters live by the First Amendment, and many pretty much live by it absolutely. On NBC Nightly News, Sara James asked Larry Moneta, "Have you ever heard of 'water buffalo' being used as a racial slur?" He replied: "The issue is not whether I have or not. The issue is also, you know, language in my mind is neutral. It's a question of the context in which is language is used."42 (Two years later, when Penn abolished its speech code, the same Larry Moneta would dutifully go before the media to declare that "At Penn, all speech is free.") The reporters were doing their jobs remarkably--probing, investigating, and developing sources. Within the administration, a growing loathing of the cruelty and utter stupidity of this case led important officials to channel information to the press. Thus, the Washington Times reported on April 27 that the postponement of Eden's trial had "prompted speculation that university President Sheldon Hackney ordered the delay to protect his pending nomination to head the National Endowment for the Humanities," to which the reporter added: "School officials, who asked not to be identified, echoed [this] sentiment and speculation about the trial's postponement."43 The case had turned over a rock at Penn, and it was not just outsiders who did not like what they saw underneath it. On that same day, the Philadelphia Daily News lectured Penn that "It's hard to justify breathtaking tuition hikes when acting like a herd of dik-diks."44

Next Page


Back To The Shadow University Home Page

shadowu@world.std.com
9/19/98